Compositional soundness proofs of abstract interpreters
Date: Wed, September 19, 2018
Room: COLLOQUIUMZAAL 0.E420
Abstract interpretation is a technique for developing static analyses. Yet, proving abstract interpreters sound is challenging for interesting analyses, because of the high proof complexity and proof effort. To reduce complexity and effort, we propose a framework for abstract interpreters that makes their soundness proof compositional. Key to our approach is to capture the similarities between concrete and abstract interpreters in a single shared interpreter, parameterized over an arrow-based interface. In our framework, a soundness proof is reduced to proving reusable soundness lemmas over the concrete and abstract instances of this interface; the soundness of the overall interpreters follows from a generic theorem.
To further reduce proof effort, we explore the relationship between soundness and parametricity. Parametricity not only provides us with useful guidelines for how to design non-leaky interfaces for shared interpreters, but also provides us with soundness of shared pure functions as free theorems. We implemented our framework in Haskell and developed a k-CFA analysis for PCF and a tree-shape analysis for Stratego. We were able to prove both analyses sound compositionally with manageable complexity and effort, compared to a conventional soundness proof.
This is joint work with Casper B. Poulsen and Sebastian Erdweg.
Robbert Krebbers | MoSeL - A General, Extensible Modal Framework for Interactive Proofs in Separation Logic
Next: Hendrik van Antwerpen | Scopes as Types